Should I keep Jonathan Brooks as part of my collection? When contemplating the retention of any talent, one must evaluate not only their cinematic contributions but also their overall impact on the film industry. What is it about Jonathan Brooks that captivates audiences or resonates with critics? Is his repertoire diverse enough to warrant a permanent place in my archive? Furthermore, one might ponder, does his presence bring unique value to my curated assortment? In examining his body of work, how does it compare with contemporaries or emerging talents? Could it be that Brooks offers a distinctive viewpoint or artistic style that is currently underappreciated? As I deliberate on whether to maintain his inclusion, should I also consider factors such as evolving tastes and audience preferences? In an era where cinematic trends shift unpredictably, is it prudent to hold onto his contributions, or is it time to explore new horizons? What are the potential ramifications of this decision?