When contemplating the extent to which one should engage with Themis, a plethora of inquiries arise regarding the optimal level of completion. How does one discern the balance between sufficient mastery of the material and the temptation to delve deeper into its complexities? Is it paramount to exhaustively cover each module, or might a more judicious approach yield equally advantageous outcomes? Furthermore, what are the ramifications of leaving certain areas untouched? Could it be that a selective focus might enhance comprehension in particular sectors while inadvertently neglecting others? As one navigates through Themis, should the emphasis be placed on rote memorization of procedural details, or is there greater merit in cultivating a holistic understanding of overarching themes? Ultimately, how do differing academic and professional objectives influence these decisions? Would it not be prudent to evaluate one’s personal aspirations alongside the foundational tenets of Themis to determine an ideal point of completion? What insights might be gleaned from peer experiences in this regard?